

Realising an AI nation
Malaysia has stark AI ambitions, marked by policy directions in the 13th Malaysia Plan, the third phase of the Malaysia Digital Economy Blueprint and an AI Action Plan 2026-2030. AI is designed to be interactive, reactive and intelligent; thus capable of inflicting biological and psychological changes to the human being, which will inevitably reverberate across society. Furthermore, these technologies are developed in several locus of power, which will create forms of digital colonisation that challenges governance, sovereignty goals and national development aims.
At the heart of the programme, the AI conference seeks to unpack the AI nation beyond 2030. We invite participants to imagine a future where humanity has augmented with machine intelligence, and ask of the values, equitable development and policy structures that they hope to see, which must be inculcated today. In the quest to realise an AI nation, ISIS Malaysia is pleased to organise a conversation that seeks to think beyond the application of technology, and seek the potential safeguards needed for safe deployment and meaningful contribution of artificial intelligence to society and the world.
Day 1 – Site visits (12 October 2026)
Experiential centre field visits:
- DNB My5G Portal
- Huawei AI Lab and Innovation Centre
Arrival and registration
- Huawei AI Lab and Innovation Centre
- DNB My5G Portal
- Huawei AI Lab and Innovation Centre
- DNB My5G Portal
- Huawei AI Lab and Innovation Centre
| Date | 12 October 2026 |
| Time | 0830-1215 |
| Venue | Level Lobby, Menara Exchange 106 |
Day 2 – Conference (13 October 2026)
Opening remarks
Datuk Prof Dr Mohd Faiz Abdullah
Executive Chairman
ISIS Malaysia
Keynote address
YB Gobind Singh Deo
Minister of Digital
A Centre for Responsible Technology session
AI governance is caught at a crossroads. On approach focuses on assigning liability to operators, processors and trainers. Another seeks to increase accountability within AI systems themselves, whether through design choices or course of interaction. For society, the prospect of sentient AI could intensify existing tensions around jobs, technology overreach and control over decision-making.
- What are the prospects for sentience in AI systems?
- What governance and security responses would be appropriate to balance the promise and perils of sentient AI?
- Can there be greater responsibility on AI systems to improve response against harms?
- Are there means to futureproof ethical obligations and responsibility in the current and future age of AI?
In the present landscape, technologies are developed and controlled by a few actors. This could lock countries and ecosystems into new forms of dependency where countries with limited digital capacity and innovation infrastructure become dependent on external platforms, systems and developers. Additionally, gaps between resource-rich and developing nations could widen as knowledge, talent, data and innovation circulate within exclusive alliances. This raises questions of sovereignty: whether nations can preserve the governance capacity and technological control in ways that serve their societies and the wider global community.
- What should developing nations and middle powers be most concerned about in emerging forms of technology dominance?
- How does digital colonisation affect innovation ambitions?
- How can the effects of digital colonisation be mitigated, especially where labour and natural resources remain key trade-offs in economic development?
- What governance efforts, platforms and capacity-building measures are needed today to strengthen resilience against technological dependence?
AI systems are increasingly positioned as neutral, authoritative “voices of reason” in decision-making, mediation and information synthesis. Yet, such systems could displace human judgement, shape interpretation of history and be granted disproportionate authority across domains, such as conflict resolution, healthcare, governance and public discourse. When AI-generated outputs are treated as objective truth, hallucinations and embedded biases could distort public understanding, weaken institutional trust and deepen social fragmentation. This session explores how societies can preserve human agency, shared truth and social cohesion when AI systems increasingly mediate knowledge and authority.
- How might AI affect socio-economic trends, such as ageing, shifting demographics, belonging and decentralisation of power? Could uneven deployment of AI affect social cohesion?
- How do AI design choices that encourage algorithmic deference, sycophancy and the “superhuman myth” reshape trust, autonomy and accountability?
- What is the potential impact of AI’s epistemic authority on Malaysian society?
- What safeguards are needed to preserve human agency, critical thinking and ethical judgment in an era where AI increasingly speaks with the voice of reason?
AI has become a catalyst for national development, with countries crafting strategies to leverage on its industrial and developmental potential. Governing AI requires international collaboration across hardware development, platform production, standards setting and safety frameworks. This is particularly challenging when key systems are developed outside domestic ecosystems, leaving countries to balance innovation, competitiveness, sovereignty and public accountability. This session explores how Malaysia and ASEAN can shape AI governance in a region increasingly mediated by human-machine systems.
- What priorities should guide a nation’s international engagements on AI strategy and governance?
- Does the absence of binding and coordinated AI safety governance weaken the region’s sovereignty over technologies that shape economic, social and security outcomes?
- Why do technology companies publicly resist binding rules while privately seeking regulatory certainty and cross-border alignment. How can ASEAN and its dialogue partners turn this dynamic into collective leverage rather than fragmented compliance?
- How should Malaysia contribute to or lead in AI safety governance and what priorities should guide its role?
| Date | 13 October 2026 |
| Time | 0800-1700 |
| Venue | Hilton Kuala Lumpur |






